Market commentary and trading strategies.
Another Reversal
Posted 09-07-2010 at 01:01 PM by wown
[Show Appreciation]
What's This?
Updated 09-07-2010 at 01:32 PM by Simit Patel
Updated 09-07-2010 at 01:32 PM by Simit Patel
Tags volatility
First week of September saw a nice rally in the markets and thankfully I was able to ride most of that move up. In fact, a friend of mine asked me "A lot of financial journals are claiming that a big sell off is coming. Should I short?" I answered "Yes, but only if SPX breaks the support at 1040". That day SPX went to 1039.88 and rallied. A couple of days later SPX went to 1039.35 and rallied all the way to 1010.
Meanwhile TOS updated its software and in the process all my charts were erased. So for a while there I was trading on gut instinct because TOS support claimed that the charts would be available soon.
On Friday I finally contacted TOS support and asked them the status. Turns out you can reverse an update and that is exactly what I did. When I got my beloved charts back I saw that SPX was trading just below 1105 resistance I had found a while ago. Not only that but the Demark countdown and setup hit 13 and 9 respectively. I quickly liquidated my long calls and now I am sitting on a put vertical. I expect the price to drop to at least 1080. However, I may be inclined to cash in the profits (currently at 4%) if the oscillator breaks the downward trend (see red line).
In other news, I am going to try increasing my position sizes. My performance and price reversal predicitions have been very accurate lately and I believe it is because I have finally found a combination of fibonacci trading techniques and indicators that work. So, feeling more confident, I am going to increase my risk apetite. Also, most of my trades have some sort of an 'insurance' policy now where even if I am wrong, I have a counter trade that at least helps me break very close to even. Of course, I am still keeping my positions and max loss at around only 4% of my account.
Finally, I have been considering what has helped me perform better lately (Compared to 8 months ago when I was down 20% of my account). First, I am not trading news anymore. By the time retail traders get wind of the news and act on it, it is almost always too late. It is also no use trying to predit the news because again, if you are making a prediction, you can bet a lot of others are as well and acting upon it.
Secondly, I have been sticking very strictly to my trade plans - taking emotion completely out of the picture. It is tough watching your trade take a 50% hit and having the patience to let it play out. I think I have finally managed to learn that lesson.
Finally, I realize that I am terrible volatility trader. Many experts out there claim that if you trade options you must trade the implied volatility. Also, they claim that since volatility usually operates within a given range, it is easier to predict. I say all of that is a bunch of crap. You have to know the direction of the move unless you are 100% delta neutral (Which is theoretical anyway) all the time. Maintining neutrality alone costs a fortune in commissions.
Additionally, and maybe this is just me, predicting volatility is just as hard, if not harder, than predicting price direction. Reason being that IV is a derived mathematical and theoretical number to which you cannot assign technical studies. So, I feel people are better off just taking advantage of the leverage properties of options to trade the underlying.
-Wown
stockjockz.blogspot.com
Meanwhile TOS updated its software and in the process all my charts were erased. So for a while there I was trading on gut instinct because TOS support claimed that the charts would be available soon.
On Friday I finally contacted TOS support and asked them the status. Turns out you can reverse an update and that is exactly what I did. When I got my beloved charts back I saw that SPX was trading just below 1105 resistance I had found a while ago. Not only that but the Demark countdown and setup hit 13 and 9 respectively. I quickly liquidated my long calls and now I am sitting on a put vertical. I expect the price to drop to at least 1080. However, I may be inclined to cash in the profits (currently at 4%) if the oscillator breaks the downward trend (see red line).
In other news, I am going to try increasing my position sizes. My performance and price reversal predicitions have been very accurate lately and I believe it is because I have finally found a combination of fibonacci trading techniques and indicators that work. So, feeling more confident, I am going to increase my risk apetite. Also, most of my trades have some sort of an 'insurance' policy now where even if I am wrong, I have a counter trade that at least helps me break very close to even. Of course, I am still keeping my positions and max loss at around only 4% of my account.
Finally, I have been considering what has helped me perform better lately (Compared to 8 months ago when I was down 20% of my account). First, I am not trading news anymore. By the time retail traders get wind of the news and act on it, it is almost always too late. It is also no use trying to predit the news because again, if you are making a prediction, you can bet a lot of others are as well and acting upon it.
Secondly, I have been sticking very strictly to my trade plans - taking emotion completely out of the picture. It is tough watching your trade take a 50% hit and having the patience to let it play out. I think I have finally managed to learn that lesson.
Finally, I realize that I am terrible volatility trader. Many experts out there claim that if you trade options you must trade the implied volatility. Also, they claim that since volatility usually operates within a given range, it is easier to predict. I say all of that is a bunch of crap. You have to know the direction of the move unless you are 100% delta neutral (Which is theoretical anyway) all the time. Maintining neutrality alone costs a fortune in commissions.
Additionally, and maybe this is just me, predicting volatility is just as hard, if not harder, than predicting price direction. Reason being that IV is a derived mathematical and theoretical number to which you cannot assign technical studies. So, I feel people are better off just taking advantage of the leverage properties of options to trade the underlying.
-Wown
stockjockz.blogspot.com
Total Comments 6
Comments
(Must register to comment)-
This is a most excellent post, I can I identify with what you are sharing, congrats and my your account continue to grow!!!Posted 09-07-2010 at 01:17 PM by larryfolson
[Show Appreciation]
What's This?
-
hey wown,
interesting blog post -- thanks for sharing. your comments on volatility reminded me of a recent blog post on bigger capital:
- biggercapital algorithm blog - What Are You Trading?Direction, Volatility, orCorrelation?Posted 09-07-2010 at 01:30 PM by Simit Patel 
[Show Appreciation]
What's This?
-
Here you about volatility. You think volatility follows the normal distribution? Price doesn't. Price is lognormal. They have skews very frequently and that is exactly what makes them tradable. I rather sell volatility than buy them because high IV usually erodes slowly at the least or maybe revert back to the mean. We can use statistics in trading volatility to a great extent. But we know its not all about volatility
Posted 09-07-2010 at 10:05 PM by forexer
[Show Appreciation]
What's This?
-
Volatility is supposed to follow a normal distribution from what I understand. Reason being that the means of multiple lognormal distribution should be normally distributed. Since the means of the multiple lognormal distribution is basically what volatility is, we should conclude that volatility is normally distributed (correct me if I am wrong - been a while since I studied option theory).Quote:Originally Posted by forexer
Here you about volatility. You think volatility follows the normal distribution? Price doesn't. Price is lognormal. They have skews very frequently and that is exactly what makes them tradable. I rather sell volatility than buy them because high IV usually erodes slowly at the least or maybe revert back to the mean. We can use statistics in trading volatility to a great extent. But we know its not all about volatility
But like price, I would argue volatility too should be lognormal because although volatility is supposed to measure the increase in price movement, [implied] volatility rises when price falls and vice versa. So IV really isn't measuring the variation in price but rather the market's belief or reaction to negative price movement. So, since price distribution can be skewed and volatility is simply the reaction to price movement, it too should be skewed.
Which brings me to my original point: if you trade IV's, you must take into account the fact that negative price movement will raise IV. So, you should long IV when you expect price to decline and vice versa. But why would you go into such complicated calculations when you could simply trade the price in the first place.
Hope all of that makes sense
Posted 09-08-2010 at 09:24 AM by wown
[Show Appreciation]
What's This?
-
Yea. Hats off to you. I'm not a math guy but i hear you on the IV being lognormal. Does IV increase on large updays?Posted 09-08-2010 at 10:33 AM by forexer
[Show Appreciation]
What's This?
-
Take a look at my latest post.
And thanks for the comments guys. Appreciate it.Posted 09-08-2010 at 11:37 AM by wown
[Show Appreciation]
What's This?
